<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 752 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</link>
    <description>Statutory pre-deposit for a GST appellate filing is described as unnecessary where the dispute concerns the nature of supply and the correct tax head under CGST and SGST, while tax has already been paid under IGST. The note distinguishes such a controversy from cases involving excess availment of input tax credit. On that footing, insistence on a 10% pre-deposit before filing an appeal to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal is presented as unwarranted, and the appeal may be filed without that deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 752 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</link>
      <description>Statutory pre-deposit for a GST appellate filing is described as unnecessary where the dispute concerns the nature of supply and the correct tax head under CGST and SGST, while tax has already been paid under IGST. The note distinguishes such a controversy from cases involving excess availment of input tax credit. On that footing, insistence on a 10% pre-deposit before filing an appeal to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal is presented as unwarranted, and the appeal may be filed without that deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>