<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 752 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</link>
    <description>GST appellate pre-deposit was not required where the disputed liability concerned classification of supply and tax treatment under CGST and SGST, while tax had already been paid under IGST. As the controversy did not involve excess availment of input tax credit, the proposed appeal to the Tribunal could be filed without the statutory 10% tax pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 752 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</link>
      <description>GST appellate pre-deposit was not required where the disputed liability concerned classification of supply and tax treatment under CGST and SGST, while tax had already been paid under IGST. As the controversy did not involve excess availment of input tax credit, the proposed appeal to the Tribunal could be filed without the statutory 10% tax pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>