<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 755 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794869</link>
    <description>Challenge to an order passed under the CGST Act was directed to be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy against the order under Section 74, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The text also clarifies that limitation would not operate as a bar if the appeal is filed within the time granted, making the appellate forum the operative route for further relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 755 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794869</link>
      <description>Challenge to an order passed under the CGST Act was directed to be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy against the order under Section 74, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The text also clarifies that limitation would not operate as a bar if the appeal is filed within the time granted, making the appellate forum the operative route for further relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>