<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469998</link>
    <description>An addition for unexplained investment in immovable property was found unsustainable where the Revenue relied on a general seller&#039;s statement and did not produce cogent, specific or corroborative material linking the assessee to any cash payment over and above the registered sale consideration. The assessee&#039;s explanation was accepted in part, but the remaining addition lacked a legally sustainable evidentiary foundation and rested on surmises and conjectures. The addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469998</link>
      <description>An addition for unexplained investment in immovable property was found unsustainable where the Revenue relied on a general seller&#039;s statement and did not produce cogent, specific or corroborative material linking the assessee to any cash payment over and above the registered sale consideration. The assessee&#039;s explanation was accepted in part, but the remaining addition lacked a legally sustainable evidentiary foundation and rested on surmises and conjectures. The addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>