https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794752 A private dispute arising from a cryptocurrency exchange cyber incident did not disclose enforceable public law rights merely because many investors were affected. The exchange was not treated as State or an instrumentality under Article 12, and the absence of a specific regulatory statute governing such exchanges meant writ jurisdiction could not be used to seek regulatory mandamus or directions for CBI/SIT investigation. Claims for release of funds and compensation also were not maintainable in writ proceedings because they depended on disputed factual questions about account balances, restrictions, loss, culpability and quantification, which require ordinary civil or other competent remedies. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794752 A private dispute arising from a cryptocurrency exchange cyber incident did not disclose enforceable public law rights merely because many investors were affected. The exchange was not treated as State or an instrumentality under Article 12, and the absence of a specific regulatory statute governing such exchanges meant writ jurisdiction could not be used to seek regulatory mandamus or directions for CBI/SIT investigation. Claims for release of funds and compensation also were not maintainable in writ proceedings because they depended on disputed factual questions about account balances, restrictions, loss, culpability and quantification, which require ordinary civil or other competent remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794752