<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 643 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794757</link>
    <description>Section 10(2) of the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976 was held not to operate retrospectively because it came into force only on 01.04.2009 and there was no clear statutory basis to apply it to an earlier assessment year. Interest could not therefore be levied for a period anterior to commencement, and the demand for the prior period was unsustainable. The settled view that such liability cannot be imposed retrospectively was treated as final, so the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 643 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794757</link>
      <description>Section 10(2) of the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976 was held not to operate retrospectively because it came into force only on 01.04.2009 and there was no clear statutory basis to apply it to an earlier assessment year. Interest could not therefore be levied for a period anterior to commencement, and the demand for the prior period was unsustainable. The settled view that such liability cannot be imposed retrospectively was treated as final, so the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>