<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 654 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794768</link>
    <description>Construction of government staff quarters and similar residential projects was treated as outside the tax net where the activity was for government accommodation and satisfied the personal-use exclusion in residential complex service, with the non-commercial character also taking it outside works contract taxation. Construction for APMC was treated as taxable because the recipient&#039;s activity was commercial in nature; suppression, non-registration, non-filing and non-payment supported invocation of the extended period, subject to cum-tax and composition relief in recomputation. GETCO-related construction was held exempt as connected with electricity transmission and distribution, and the surviving tax and penalty were remanded for fresh calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 654 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794768</link>
      <description>Construction of government staff quarters and similar residential projects was treated as outside the tax net where the activity was for government accommodation and satisfied the personal-use exclusion in residential complex service, with the non-commercial character also taking it outside works contract taxation. Construction for APMC was treated as taxable because the recipient&#039;s activity was commercial in nature; suppression, non-registration, non-filing and non-payment supported invocation of the extended period, subject to cum-tax and composition relief in recomputation. GETCO-related construction was held exempt as connected with electricity transmission and distribution, and the surviving tax and penalty were remanded for fresh calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>