https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52644 The appeal was rejected due to lack of permission for extending the warehousing period. The appellant had fulfilled all requirements for the extension of the bond period, including providing a Corporate Guarantee supported by a Board resolution. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of obtaining a decision on the extension application before confirming the demand and remanded the case to obtain a decision on the extension and re-export permission within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal stressed the importance of following the legal process and granting reasonable opportunities to the appellants/importers. en-us Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:13:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52644 The appeal was rejected due to lack of permission for extending the warehousing period. The appellant had fulfilled all requirements for the extension of the bond period, including providing a Corporate Guarantee supported by a Board resolution. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of obtaining a decision on the extension application before confirming the demand and remanded the case to obtain a decision on the extension and re-export permission within a specified timeframe. The Tribunal stressed the importance of following the legal process and granting reasonable opportunities to the appellants/importers. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52644