<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 671 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794785</link>
    <description>A benami finding could not be sustained where the conclusions on benamidar status and beneficial ownership were reached without full appreciation of the entire evidentiary record, including statements, affidavits and seized material. The appellate tribunal found the conflicting material on purchase consideration, the appellant&#039;s capacity and the alleged beneficial owner&#039;s role had not been properly weighed, so the order confirming provisional attachment and declaring the property benami was set aside. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration of all facts and evidence, and status quo over the property was maintained pending adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 671 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794785</link>
      <description>A benami finding could not be sustained where the conclusions on benamidar status and beneficial ownership were reached without full appreciation of the entire evidentiary record, including statements, affidavits and seized material. The appellate tribunal found the conflicting material on purchase consideration, the appellant&#039;s capacity and the alleged beneficial owner&#039;s role had not been properly weighed, so the order confirming provisional attachment and declaring the property benami was set aside. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration of all facts and evidence, and status quo over the property was maintained pending adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>