https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794786 Cash routed after demonetisation through accounts controlled by the alleged benamidar, coupled with the absence of convincing independent evidence of a genuine business relationship or gold sale, supported the inference of a planned benami transaction. The Tribunal upheld confirmation of the provisional attachment under the benami law. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the proceedings because no prejudice was shown: one statement was not on record and, for the other, the appellant had been supplied the statement and the witness had not appeared when summoned. The appeal failed and the attachment was sustained. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794786 Cash routed after demonetisation through accounts controlled by the alleged benamidar, coupled with the absence of convincing independent evidence of a genuine business relationship or gold sale, supported the inference of a planned benami transaction. The Tribunal upheld confirmation of the provisional attachment under the benami law. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the proceedings because no prejudice was shown: one statement was not on record and, for the other, the appellant had been supplied the statement and the witness had not appeared when summoned. The appeal failed and the attachment was sustained. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794786