<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 683 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794797</link>
    <description>A liberal approach to condonation of delay was applied where the assessee claimed that a change of address meant the assessment proceedings and demand notice were not within her knowledge until much later. On that basis, and in light of natural justice, the matter was permitted to be heard on merits. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, subject to costs, and the delay issue was directed not to be raised again before the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 683 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794797</link>
      <description>A liberal approach to condonation of delay was applied where the assessee claimed that a change of address meant the assessment proceedings and demand notice were not within her knowledge until much later. On that basis, and in light of natural justice, the matter was permitted to be heard on merits. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, subject to costs, and the delay issue was directed not to be raised again before the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>