<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 117 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52641</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed against the order confirming duty, redemption fine, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The duty demand was set aside due to lack of tangible evidence, with duty on seized goods confirmed. Redemption fine and penalty were reduced, and confiscation of the truck was overturned. The impugned orders were modified, disposing of the appeals in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 117 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52641</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed against the order confirming duty, redemption fine, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The duty demand was set aside due to lack of tangible evidence, with duty on seized goods confirmed. Redemption fine and penalty were reduced, and confiscation of the truck was overturned. The impugned orders were modified, disposing of the appeals in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>