<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 699 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794813</link>
    <description>Delay in filing Form 10-IC under Section 119(2)(b) may be condoned where the assessee had exercised the option for concessional taxation in the return, paid tax at the concessional rate, and the omission was a bona fide, inadvertent lapse in the first year of operation. The Telangana HC noted that CBDT circulars addressing hardship in filing Form 10-IC reflected a liberal approach for cases where the return was filed on time, the Section 115BAA option was disclosed in the return, and genuine hardship was shown. On that basis, a rigid refusal to condone delay was inconsistent with the beneficial object of the provision, and the procedural omission should not by itself deny the Section 115BAA benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 699 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794813</link>
      <description>Delay in filing Form 10-IC under Section 119(2)(b) may be condoned where the assessee had exercised the option for concessional taxation in the return, paid tax at the concessional rate, and the omission was a bona fide, inadvertent lapse in the first year of operation. The Telangana HC noted that CBDT circulars addressing hardship in filing Form 10-IC reflected a liberal approach for cases where the return was filed on time, the Section 115BAA option was disclosed in the return, and genuine hardship was shown. On that basis, a rigid refusal to condone delay was inconsistent with the beneficial object of the provision, and the procedural omission should not by itself deny the Section 115BAA benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>