<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Business expenditure on margin shortfall charges and borrowed-fund interest allowed; LIC commission deduction remained partly restricted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101611</link>
    <description>Absence of separate books for the LIC commission activity justified only an estimated deduction, and the existing disallowance was upheld because the allowed amount broadly matched the admissible estimate on gross commission. Margin shortfall charges paid to NCDEX were treated as compensatory, not as expenditure for an offence or prohibited act, so they were held allowable as business expenditure and the disallowance was deleted. An ad hoc interest disallowance on borrowed funds was also deleted because the borrowings were shown to be absorbed in business assets and receivables, no specific non-business advance was identified, and the books were not found defective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Business expenditure on margin shortfall charges and borrowed-fund interest allowed; LIC commission deduction remained partly restricted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101611</link>
      <description>Absence of separate books for the LIC commission activity justified only an estimated deduction, and the existing disallowance was upheld because the allowed amount broadly matched the admissible estimate on gross commission. Margin shortfall charges paid to NCDEX were treated as compensatory, not as expenditure for an offence or prohibited act, so they were held allowable as business expenditure and the disallowance was deleted. An ad hoc interest disallowance on borrowed funds was also deleted because the borrowings were shown to be absorbed in business assets and receivables, no specific non-business advance was identified, and the books were not found defective.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>