<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal-use exclusion and APMC construction taxability guide service tax treatment of government works contract disputes</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101595</link>
    <description>Residential staff quarters built for Government departments and agencies were treated as intended for personal use, so the demand on those contracts remained dropped. Services for GETCO and other non-commercial Government works were also sustained as non-taxable, including transmission and distribution of electricity works covered by exemption principles. By contrast, construction services for APMC were held taxable for the pre-negative list period because APMC renting or allotting space is commercial in nature under Supreme Court precedent. The extended period was upheld due to non-registration, non-filing, non-payment and suppression, while recomputation had to allow the works contract composition scheme and cum-tax benefit, with penalty to follow the revised demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal-use exclusion and APMC construction taxability guide service tax treatment of government works contract disputes</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101595</link>
      <description>Residential staff quarters built for Government departments and agencies were treated as intended for personal use, so the demand on those contracts remained dropped. Services for GETCO and other non-commercial Government works were also sustained as non-taxable, including transmission and distribution of electricity works covered by exemption principles. By contrast, construction services for APMC were held taxable for the pre-negative list period because APMC renting or allotting space is commercial in nature under Supreme Court precedent. The extended period was upheld due to non-registration, non-filing, non-payment and suppression, while recomputation had to allow the works contract composition scheme and cum-tax benefit, with penalty to follow the revised demand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:46:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>