<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1746 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469963</link>
    <description>A Customs Broker licence cannot be revoked, security deposit forfeited, or penalty imposed through a mechanically repeated order or on a deemed future contingency under Regulation 17(7) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018; the provision contemplates a specific, operative order on the inquiry report. The alleged breaches of Regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) and 10(n) were also not proved, as the record did not establish failure to advise the client, lack of due diligence, withholding of information, deficient record-keeping, or inadequate antecedent verification. The revocation and connected penal consequences were therefore held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1746 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469963</link>
      <description>A Customs Broker licence cannot be revoked, security deposit forfeited, or penalty imposed through a mechanically repeated order or on a deemed future contingency under Regulation 17(7) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018; the provision contemplates a specific, operative order on the inquiry report. The alleged breaches of Regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) and 10(n) were also not proved, as the record did not establish failure to advise the client, lack of due diligence, withholding of information, deficient record-keeping, or inadequate antecedent verification. The revocation and connected penal consequences were therefore held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>