<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469976</link>
    <description>Section 153C could not be validly invoked against a person other than the searched person unless the record showed a valid recorded satisfaction note establishing jurisdiction. As no satisfaction note was produced and the Assessing Officer admitted that no copy was available in the office records, the jurisdictional foundation failed. The assessment was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee, and the challenge to approval under section 153D became academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469976</link>
      <description>Section 153C could not be validly invoked against a person other than the searched person unless the record showed a valid recorded satisfaction note establishing jurisdiction. As no satisfaction note was produced and the Assessing Officer admitted that no copy was available in the office records, the jurisdictional foundation failed. The assessment was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee, and the challenge to approval under section 153D became academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>