<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469982</link>
    <description>Registration under Section 80G was remanded because the assessee&#039;s constitution disclosed charitable objects and some charitable activity was shown, but supporting evidence and activity details were not filed before the Commissioner (Exemption). The ITAT held that the rejection could not stand without considering the material and restored the matter to allow the assessee an opportunity to furnish the required evidence for establishing charitable activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469982</link>
      <description>Registration under Section 80G was remanded because the assessee&#039;s constitution disclosed charitable objects and some charitable activity was shown, but supporting evidence and activity details were not filed before the Commissioner (Exemption). The ITAT held that the rejection could not stand without considering the material and restored the matter to allow the assessee an opportunity to furnish the required evidence for establishing charitable activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>