<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 598 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794712</link>
    <description>Proceedings arising from the impugned order-in-original were directed to remain in abeyance pending disposal of the Supreme Court&#039;s proceedings on the same classification dispute. The HC also restrained any coercive recovery steps for duty, interest, penalty, or confiscation of goods until the Supreme Court disposes of the matter and for four weeks thereafter. No view was expressed on the merits of the classification dispute, and all contentions were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 598 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794712</link>
      <description>Proceedings arising from the impugned order-in-original were directed to remain in abeyance pending disposal of the Supreme Court&#039;s proceedings on the same classification dispute. The HC also restrained any coercive recovery steps for duty, interest, penalty, or confiscation of goods until the Supreme Court disposes of the matter and for four weeks thereafter. No view was expressed on the merits of the classification dispute, and all contentions were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>