<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 634 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794748</link>
    <description>Parity is not a mechanical ground for bail in economic offences, and a successive bail application must rest on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the merits. The text states that the accused was alleged to be the principal architect of a fraudulent GST evasion syndicate involving fictitious firms, fake invoices, bogus e-way bills, and supporting documentary and electronic material. On that material, the co-accused&#039;s bail did not place the accused on the same footing, and the individual role attributed to the accused remained decisive. The second bail application was therefore liable to be rejected for want of parity and any material change in circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 634 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794748</link>
      <description>Parity is not a mechanical ground for bail in economic offences, and a successive bail application must rest on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the merits. The text states that the accused was alleged to be the principal architect of a fraudulent GST evasion syndicate involving fictitious firms, fake invoices, bogus e-way bills, and supporting documentary and electronic material. On that material, the co-accused&#039;s bail did not place the accused on the same footing, and the individual role attributed to the accused remained decisive. The second bail application was therefore liable to be rejected for want of parity and any material change in circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>