<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 635 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794749</link>
    <description>Sealed outlets were to remain under regulatory scrutiny pending production and examination of the books of account under a search authorisation issued under the DGST Act. The Delhi HC directed the petitioner to produce the books before the competent authority on the specified date, and required that authority to pass an order in accordance with law within five days thereafter. Liberty was reserved to consider de-sealing if appropriate, so the dispute was disposed of on those directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 635 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794749</link>
      <description>Sealed outlets were to remain under regulatory scrutiny pending production and examination of the books of account under a search authorisation issued under the DGST Act. The Delhi HC directed the petitioner to produce the books before the competent authority on the specified date, and required that authority to pass an order in accordance with law within five days thereafter. Liberty was reserved to consider de-sealing if appropriate, so the dispute was disposed of on those directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>