<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 636 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794750</link>
    <description>A deposit made during investigation was treated as a pre-deposit for interest purposes under the statutory scheme, and interest was already granted in line with Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the relevant notification. As no challenge was raised to the validity of the provision or the notification fixing the interest rate, the Court noted that its appellate jurisdiction under Section 35G is limited to substantial questions of law and cannot be used to substitute a higher rate on equitable grounds. The assessee was therefore not entitled to interest above 6% per annum, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 636 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794750</link>
      <description>A deposit made during investigation was treated as a pre-deposit for interest purposes under the statutory scheme, and interest was already granted in line with Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the relevant notification. As no challenge was raised to the validity of the provision or the notification fixing the interest rate, the Court noted that its appellate jurisdiction under Section 35G is limited to substantial questions of law and cannot be used to substitute a higher rate on equitable grounds. The assessee was therefore not entitled to interest above 6% per annum, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>