<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Successive bail on parity fails without substantial change in circumstances, especially in alleged economic offences involving GST evasion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101574</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications require a substantial change in facts or circumstances directly affecting the merits; parity with a co-accused alone does not justify release because the court must assess the accused&#039;s individual role, the gravity of the allegations and the investigation material. Economic offences are treated as a distinct class for bail and attract a stricter approach because they may involve deliberate conspiracies and broader financial harm. On the stated facts, the accused was prima facie linked to fictitious firms, fake invoices, e-way bills and alleged GST evasion through documentary, electronic and recorded statement material, so later bail to a co-accused did not amount to a sufficient change in circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Successive bail on parity fails without substantial change in circumstances, especially in alleged economic offences involving GST evasion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101574</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications require a substantial change in facts or circumstances directly affecting the merits; parity with a co-accused alone does not justify release because the court must assess the accused&#039;s individual role, the gravity of the allegations and the investigation material. Economic offences are treated as a distinct class for bail and attract a stricter approach because they may involve deliberate conspiracies and broader financial harm. On the stated facts, the accused was prima facie linked to fictitious firms, fake invoices, e-way bills and alleged GST evasion through documentary, electronic and recorded statement material, so later bail to a co-accused did not amount to a sufficient change in circumstances.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>