<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52618</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, a plastic raw material manufacturer engaged in electricity generation using naphtha, natural gas, or high-speed oil. The Tribunal held that duty on naphtha used for generating electricity wasted due to uncontrollable circumstances need not be reversed. Additionally, as the source of sold electricity was a mix of fuels, credit reversal was limited to the portion notionally attributed to naphtha-generated electricity. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand on naphtha used in electricity generation and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52618</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, a plastic raw material manufacturer engaged in electricity generation using naphtha, natural gas, or high-speed oil. The Tribunal held that duty on naphtha used for generating electricity wasted due to uncontrollable circumstances need not be reversed. Additionally, as the source of sold electricity was a mix of fuels, credit reversal was limited to the portion notionally attributed to naphtha-generated electricity. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand on naphtha used in electricity generation and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>