https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469931 Extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held to be unsuitable for directing a Special Investigation Team absent exceptional circumstances, a prima facie basis, or exhaustion of ordinary remedies, so no investigation order was issued. A mandamus could not be used to compel the framing of stricter cryptocurrency policy or a regulatory regime, because the Court cannot assume a legislative role or create law where an existing legal duty is absent. Private respondents not shown to be State under Article 12 or to perform public functions were not amenable to writ relief for release of invested monies, so the monetary claim was not entertained in writ jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:20:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469931 Extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held to be unsuitable for directing a Special Investigation Team absent exceptional circumstances, a prima facie basis, or exhaustion of ordinary remedies, so no investigation order was issued. A mandamus could not be used to compel the framing of stricter cryptocurrency policy or a regulatory regime, because the Court cannot assume a legislative role or create law where an existing legal duty is absent. Private respondents not shown to be State under Article 12 or to perform public functions were not amenable to writ relief for release of invested monies, so the monetary claim was not entertained in writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469931