<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1648 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469943</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80JJAA should not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed after the prescribed time, where the assessee had satisfied the substantive eligibility conditions and the form was on record before processing under section 143(1). The delay in furnishing the form is treated as a procedural defect, not a ground to defeat an otherwise valid claim, particularly when no prejudice is shown to the Revenue. On that basis, the disallowance was required to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:20:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1648 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469943</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80JJAA should not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed after the prescribed time, where the assessee had satisfied the substantive eligibility conditions and the form was on record before processing under section 143(1). The delay in furnishing the form is treated as a procedural defect, not a ground to defeat an otherwise valid claim, particularly when no prejudice is shown to the Revenue. On that basis, the disallowance was required to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>