<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 153 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52615</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as available for MS tubes and pipes used to convey steam, water and gases, the supporting structure, and a coil used in the mill or kiln, because they had a functional nexus with manufacture within the relevant capital goods definition. Credit was denied for Silo-related items and computer control monitors, as the Silo only received finished goods and the monitors were not part of eligible manufacturing plant under the tariff-based test then applicable. Credit was also refused for steel sheets/plates, steel structure and asbestos rope under the more restrictive capital goods definition, since they were repair materials or did not fall within any covered category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 153 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52615</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as available for MS tubes and pipes used to convey steam, water and gases, the supporting structure, and a coil used in the mill or kiln, because they had a functional nexus with manufacture within the relevant capital goods definition. Credit was denied for Silo-related items and computer control monitors, as the Silo only received finished goods and the monitors were not part of eligible manufacturing plant under the tariff-based test then applicable. Credit was also refused for steel sheets/plates, steel structure and asbestos rope under the more restrictive capital goods definition, since they were repair materials or did not fall within any covered category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>