<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52614</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed two appeals for failure to explain the delay in filing. Applications for restoration were rejected as the appeals had already been dismissed. The applicants were advised to pursue appeals in a higher forum if dissatisfied. Applications for restoration were deemed not maintainable and were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 240 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52614</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed two appeals for failure to explain the delay in filing. Applications for restoration were rejected as the appeals had already been dismissed. The applicants were advised to pursue appeals in a higher forum if dissatisfied. Applications for restoration were deemed not maintainable and were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>