<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794649</link>
    <description>A CESTAT Mumbai decision referred the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting views on whether DEPB scrips obtained by fraud or forgery can still be enforced against a transferee for duty, penalty, interest and confiscation. The reference also covers the allied limitation issues arising from such transfers. The operative effect is that the conflicting legal questions were not finally decided at this stage and were sent for authoritative resolution by a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794649</link>
      <description>A CESTAT Mumbai decision referred the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting views on whether DEPB scrips obtained by fraud or forgery can still be enforced against a transferee for duty, penalty, interest and confiscation. The reference also covers the allied limitation issues arising from such transfers. The operative effect is that the conflicting legal questions were not finally decided at this stage and were sent for authoritative resolution by a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>