<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 536 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794650</link>
    <description>Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act provides a statutory appeal to the Tribunal against anti-dumping determinations concerning dumping, injury and resulting duties. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 remains available only in exceptional circumstances, including gross denial of natural justice, breach of mandatory procedure or lack of jurisdiction. Challenges to methodology, valuation, landed-value computation, non-injurious price, injury margin and lesser-duty assessment ordinarily require appellate scrutiny rather than writ reappraisal. Where parties received hearings, non-confidential material and consideration of relevant submissions, the statutory appellate remedy governs; a pending Tribunal challenge by another interested party may further weigh against writ intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 536 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794650</link>
      <description>Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act provides a statutory appeal to the Tribunal against anti-dumping determinations concerning dumping, injury and resulting duties. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 remains available only in exceptional circumstances, including gross denial of natural justice, breach of mandatory procedure or lack of jurisdiction. Challenges to methodology, valuation, landed-value computation, non-injurious price, injury margin and lesser-duty assessment ordinarily require appellate scrutiny rather than writ reappraisal. Where parties received hearings, non-confidential material and consideration of relevant submissions, the statutory appellate remedy governs; a pending Tribunal challenge by another interested party may further weigh against writ intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>