<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 542 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794656</link>
    <description>Deduction for a political-party donation under section 80GGC cannot be disallowed solely because the recipient party is alleged to have provided bogus accommodation entries. The available facts did not establish that the party charged commission, refunded the donation, or conferred any direct benefit on the assessee. Applying parity with a coordinate-bench ruling, the disallowance was not sustainable and the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 542 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794656</link>
      <description>Deduction for a political-party donation under section 80GGC cannot be disallowed solely because the recipient party is alleged to have provided bogus accommodation entries. The available facts did not establish that the party charged commission, refunded the donation, or conferred any direct benefit on the assessee. Applying parity with a coordinate-bench ruling, the disallowance was not sustainable and the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>