<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 556 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794670</link>
    <description>Addition under section 69 for alleged unexplained investment in immovable property was deleted where the assessee produced registered agreements, bank statements, receipts and audited balance sheets showing that the investments were made in earlier years and were recorded in the books. The original addition rested mainly on AIR information and non-compliance during assessment, but remand verification confirmed that the flats were purchased earlier and that the shop investment was also supported by records, with the higher AIR value reflecting registration-time valuation. On those findings, the source and timing of the investments were satisfactorily explained, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 556 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794670</link>
      <description>Addition under section 69 for alleged unexplained investment in immovable property was deleted where the assessee produced registered agreements, bank statements, receipts and audited balance sheets showing that the investments were made in earlier years and were recorded in the books. The original addition rested mainly on AIR information and non-compliance during assessment, but remand verification confirmed that the flats were purchased earlier and that the shop investment was also supported by records, with the higher AIR value reflecting registration-time valuation. On those findings, the source and timing of the investments were satisfactorily explained, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>