https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52606 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the rejection of appeals by Samrat Exporters and Importers and Shri A.M. Moidu by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to filing beyond the condonable period. The Tribunal determined that the appeals were delayed as the initial letters were not appeals but requests for recovery stay. Emphasizing the lack of jurisdiction to condone delays beyond statutory limits, the Tribunal referenced a previous decision and dismissed the appeals on 15-9-2003. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:02:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52606 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the rejection of appeals by Samrat Exporters and Importers and Shri A.M. Moidu by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to filing beyond the condonable period. The Tribunal determined that the appeals were delayed as the initial letters were not appeals but requests for recovery stay. Emphasizing the lack of jurisdiction to condone delays beyond statutory limits, the Tribunal referenced a previous decision and dismissed the appeals on 15-9-2003. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52606