https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794696 A review application failed because the petitioner showed no recognised ground for review. The HC found that the alleged misinterpretation of earlier judgments and the claimed omission to deal with certain prayers, pleadings and contentions did not establish an error apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new material, or patent illegality. As none of the settled review grounds was made out on a bare perusal of the papers, the review petition was not entertained and was dismissed. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794696 A review application failed because the petitioner showed no recognised ground for review. The HC found that the alleged misinterpretation of earlier judgments and the claimed omission to deal with certain prayers, pleadings and contentions did not establish an error apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new material, or patent illegality. As none of the settled review grounds was made out on a bare perusal of the papers, the review petition was not entertained and was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794696