<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 276 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52605</link>
    <description>An appeal against a Superintendent&#039;s letter was found not maintainable because the letter merely communicated an earlier rejection of the request for transfer of Modvat credit, which had already been decided by the Commissioner. The communication was treated as not being an appealable order in itself, so the challenge could not be entertained and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 276 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52605</link>
      <description>An appeal against a Superintendent&#039;s letter was found not maintainable because the letter merely communicated an earlier rejection of the request for transfer of Modvat credit, which had already been decided by the Commissioner. The communication was treated as not being an appealable order in itself, so the challenge could not be entertained and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>