<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1898 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469911</link>
    <description>Project marketing expenses incurred for commercial properties were claimed as revenue expenditure in the profit and loss account without being capitalised in work-in-progress. The assessee, a real estate developer, had not effected any sale of commercial property during the year, and the revenue authorities&#039; adjustment was treated as tax-neutral because any allowance or disallowance would require corresponding adjustments in later years through carry forward, set-off, or work-in-progress. Given the practical difficulty of making year-wise adjustments across multiple assessment years, the addition was deleted and the claim was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1898 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469911</link>
      <description>Project marketing expenses incurred for commercial properties were claimed as revenue expenditure in the profit and loss account without being capitalised in work-in-progress. The assessee, a real estate developer, had not effected any sale of commercial property during the year, and the revenue authorities&#039; adjustment was treated as tax-neutral because any allowance or disallowance would require corresponding adjustments in later years through carry forward, set-off, or work-in-progress. Given the practical difficulty of making year-wise adjustments across multiple assessment years, the addition was deleted and the claim was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>