<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1442 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469922</link>
    <description>Section 68, as amended for closely held companies, requires proof of investor identity, creditworthiness, genuineness of the transaction, and the source of the source for share capital and share premium. The text states that the Assessing Officer did not make adequate verification of the investors and lenders, and that the material before the Principal Commissioner raised serious doubts about creditworthiness, bank credits, and the ability of several subscribers to make the stated investments. On that basis, the assessment was treated as having been completed without the enquiries required by law, so revision under section 263 was considered valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1442 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469922</link>
      <description>Section 68, as amended for closely held companies, requires proof of investor identity, creditworthiness, genuineness of the transaction, and the source of the source for share capital and share premium. The text states that the Assessing Officer did not make adequate verification of the investors and lenders, and that the material before the Principal Commissioner raised serious doubts about creditworthiness, bank credits, and the ability of several subscribers to make the stated investments. On that basis, the assessment was treated as having been completed without the enquiries required by law, so revision under section 263 was considered valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>