https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469883 Termination of a lease based on an alleged breach already in issue before a civil court could not be used to treat the occupant as an unauthorised occupant for immediate eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; the eviction proceedings were therefore not maintainable at that stage and could be pursued afresh only if the civil dispute was ultimately lost. The separate controversy over free beds for weaker sections had already attained finality and did not sustain the impugned action. The governing principle was that eviction machinery should not proceed while the foundational lease-breach dispute remains sub judice. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:22:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469883 Termination of a lease based on an alleged breach already in issue before a civil court could not be used to treat the occupant as an unauthorised occupant for immediate eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; the eviction proceedings were therefore not maintainable at that stage and could be pursued afresh only if the civil dispute was ultimately lost. The separate controversy over free beds for weaker sections had already attained finality and did not sustain the impugned action. The governing principle was that eviction machinery should not proceed while the foundational lease-breach dispute remains sub judice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469883