<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 459 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794573</link>
    <description>Restaurant service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 was confined to the air-conditioned restaurant service covered by the exemption structure in Notification No. 25/2012-ST as amended, and could not be extended to food and beverages supplied in a separately demarcated non-air-conditioned section merely because another part of the same premises was air-conditioned. The Tribunal treated the common kitchen, separate billing, and distinct restaurant segments as supporting separate service streams, and relied on the Board&#039;s contemporaneous circular as a relevant clarification. On that basis, service tax was not leviable on the non-air-conditioned portion, and the demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 459 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794573</link>
      <description>Restaurant service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 was confined to the air-conditioned restaurant service covered by the exemption structure in Notification No. 25/2012-ST as amended, and could not be extended to food and beverages supplied in a separately demarcated non-air-conditioned section merely because another part of the same premises was air-conditioned. The Tribunal treated the common kitchen, separate billing, and distinct restaurant segments as supporting separate service streams, and relied on the Board&#039;s contemporaneous circular as a relevant clarification. On that basis, service tax was not leviable on the non-air-conditioned portion, and the demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>