<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 461 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794575</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for the sub-lease rent demand absent proven wilful suppression or genuine interpretational ambiguity, so that demand was set aside on time-bar. Electricity charges recovered from lessees as reimbursement of actual consumption were treated as non-taxable outgo rather than consideration for service, and that demand was also set aside. For CENVAT credit, the show-cause notice period was time-barred because deliberate suppression with intent to evade was not established, but the statement-of-demand disallowance was sustained where only welfare or personal-use services lacked the requisite nexus with output service. Penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 461 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794575</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for the sub-lease rent demand absent proven wilful suppression or genuine interpretational ambiguity, so that demand was set aside on time-bar. Electricity charges recovered from lessees as reimbursement of actual consumption were treated as non-taxable outgo rather than consideration for service, and that demand was also set aside. For CENVAT credit, the show-cause notice period was time-barred because deliberate suppression with intent to evade was not established, but the statement-of-demand disallowance was sustained where only welfare or personal-use services lacked the requisite nexus with output service. Penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>