https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794577 A challenge to an appellate tribunal order under the PMLA failed because the High Court had already, in earlier connected matters arising from the same common tribunal order, upheld the tribunal's findings on absence of a valid reason to believe for provisional attachment, mechanical issuance of notice, and related jurisdictional objections. Finding no distinguishing material and applying judicial propriety, the Court followed the existing precedent and refused to take a different view. The appeal was dismissed and the tribunal's direction setting aside the attachment in part and ordering release of properties remained intact. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794577 A challenge to an appellate tribunal order under the PMLA failed because the High Court had already, in earlier connected matters arising from the same common tribunal order, upheld the tribunal's findings on absence of a valid reason to believe for provisional attachment, mechanical issuance of notice, and related jurisdictional objections. Finding no distinguishing material and applying judicial propriety, the Court followed the existing precedent and refused to take a different view. The appeal was dismissed and the tribunal's direction setting aside the attachment in part and ordering release of properties remained intact. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794577