<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 471 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794585</link>
    <description>A penalty cannot be sustained in full where the record does not establish a fully proved contravention attributable to the noticee, even if the goods were intercepted before reaching the alleged recipient. The tribunal noted that the appellant failed to cooperate with repeated summonses and did not appear to record a statement, which justified some penal consequence. The original penalty was therefore reduced to a commensurate amount, and the reduced penalty remained payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 471 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794585</link>
      <description>A penalty cannot be sustained in full where the record does not establish a fully proved contravention attributable to the noticee, even if the goods were intercepted before reaching the alleged recipient. The tribunal noted that the appellant failed to cooperate with repeated summonses and did not appear to record a statement, which justified some penal consequence. The original penalty was therefore reduced to a commensurate amount, and the reduced penalty remained payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>