<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 479 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794593</link>
    <description>Reassessment beyond four years based only on Investigation Wing material and without independent enquiry was invalid because the reasons showed borrowed satisfaction, no tangible material, and no specific failure to disclose primary facts; the reassessment orders were quashed. Additions treating share sale proceeds as unexplained credits and related commission as unexplained expenditure were also unsustainable because the assessees produced contract notes, demat and bank records, broker ledgers and STT evidence, the transactions were accepted as genuine, and taxing the same sale consideration again would result in double addition; the section 68 and 69C additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 479 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794593</link>
      <description>Reassessment beyond four years based only on Investigation Wing material and without independent enquiry was invalid because the reasons showed borrowed satisfaction, no tangible material, and no specific failure to disclose primary facts; the reassessment orders were quashed. Additions treating share sale proceeds as unexplained credits and related commission as unexplained expenditure were also unsustainable because the assessees produced contract notes, demat and bank records, broker ledgers and STT evidence, the transactions were accepted as genuine, and taxing the same sale consideration again would result in double addition; the section 68 and 69C additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>