<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 482 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794596</link>
    <description>Functional comparability is central to transfer pricing: entities engaged in pathology, radiology, imaging, healthcare, software development, data processing and contact-centre activities were held functionally dissimilar to a basic market research and testing service provider operating on a cost-plus, no-risk basis, so inappropriate comparables were excluded and the transfer pricing challenge succeeded. Depreciation on computer software was not finally rejected; it was restored for verification of whether the asset qualified for the claimed rate or only as an intangible asset at a lower rate. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) on international travel expenses was also remitted for factual verification of tax deduction and deposit, resulting in partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 482 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794596</link>
      <description>Functional comparability is central to transfer pricing: entities engaged in pathology, radiology, imaging, healthcare, software development, data processing and contact-centre activities were held functionally dissimilar to a basic market research and testing service provider operating on a cost-plus, no-risk basis, so inappropriate comparables were excluded and the transfer pricing challenge succeeded. Depreciation on computer software was not finally rejected; it was restored for verification of whether the asset qualified for the claimed rate or only as an intangible asset at a lower rate. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) on international travel expenses was also remitted for factual verification of tax deduction and deposit, resulting in partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>