<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794610</link>
    <description>Interest-free advances to a wholly owned subsidiary were accepted as commercially expedient where ledger, bank and project records showed business deployment and no interest had accrued, so the notional interest addition was deleted. A blanket 20% disallowance of power and fuel, administrative, and repairs and maintenance was rejected because the assessee produced invoices, confirmations, bank payments and reconciliations, with no specific bogus item identified. Trade payables were also held not to be unexplained cash credits under section 68 because party-wise ledgers, PAN details, confirmations and bank entries established identity and commercial origin; the Revenue challenge therefore failed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794610</link>
      <description>Interest-free advances to a wholly owned subsidiary were accepted as commercially expedient where ledger, bank and project records showed business deployment and no interest had accrued, so the notional interest addition was deleted. A blanket 20% disallowance of power and fuel, administrative, and repairs and maintenance was rejected because the assessee produced invoices, confirmations, bank payments and reconciliations, with no specific bogus item identified. Trade payables were also held not to be unexplained cash credits under section 68 because party-wise ledgers, PAN details, confirmations and bank entries established identity and commercial origin; the Revenue challenge therefore failed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>