https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794635 Input tax credit was denied and tax, interest and penalty were confirmed because the assessment orders rested on unrebutted factual defects: the agreement was not produced in original, its date did not match the purchase date of the stamp paper, and the invoice was issued after cancellation of the supplier's GST registration. In writ jurisdiction, no infirmity was shown in those factual conclusions, so the tax proposal was left undisturbed and the denial of ITC was sustained. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:08:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794635 Input tax credit was denied and tax, interest and penalty were confirmed because the assessment orders rested on unrebutted factual defects: the agreement was not produced in original, its date did not match the purchase date of the stamp paper, and the invoice was issued after cancellation of the supplier's GST registration. In writ jurisdiction, no infirmity was shown in those factual conclusions, so the tax proposal was left undisturbed and the denial of ITC was sustained. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794635