<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1824 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469876</link>
    <description>Compensation received on severance of employment under a voluntary settlement linked to closure of the employer&#039;s unit was treated as a capital receipt arising from loss of employment and loss of source of income. The ITAT held that such ex-gratia payment was not salary or profit in lieu of salary, and therefore was not taxable in the employee&#039;s hands. On that basis, the addition made by the revenue was deleted and relief under section 89(1) was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1824 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469876</link>
      <description>Compensation received on severance of employment under a voluntary settlement linked to closure of the employer&#039;s unit was treated as a capital receipt arising from loss of employment and loss of source of income. The ITAT held that such ex-gratia payment was not salary or profit in lieu of salary, and therefore was not taxable in the employee&#039;s hands. On that basis, the addition made by the revenue was deleted and relief under section 89(1) was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>