<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2021 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469877</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not survive where the corresponding quantum additions in search-related assessments were deleted in appeal. Once the additions ceased to exist, there was no remaining basis to treat any income as concealed or to allege furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty order was entirely dependent on additions that no longer survived, so deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2021 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469877</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not survive where the corresponding quantum additions in search-related assessments were deleted in appeal. Once the additions ceased to exist, there was no remaining basis to treat any income as concealed or to allege furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty order was entirely dependent on additions that no longer survived, so deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>