<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52580</link>
    <description>UV lamps and fluorescent tubes were held not to qualify as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they were not parts of any specific machine and were classifiable under Heading 85.39, which was outside the covered tariff entries. Credit was therefore wrongly availed and was disallowed. As the availment was improper, penalty for wrongful credit was also sustained against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:18:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52580</link>
      <description>UV lamps and fluorescent tubes were held not to qualify as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they were not parts of any specific machine and were classifiable under Heading 85.39, which was outside the covered tariff entries. Credit was therefore wrongly availed and was disallowed. As the availment was improper, penalty for wrongful credit was also sustained against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>