<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52578</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not require reversal or payment on bagasse cleared during sugar manufacture because bagasse arose as waste or by-product in the course of production and was not a final product merely by reference to the tariff. Rule 57D(1) protected credit where inputs were contained in waste, refuse, or by-product arising during manufacture, and that special protection made the Rule 57CC reversal mechanism inapplicable. The Revenue&#039;s contention therefore failed, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52578</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not require reversal or payment on bagasse cleared during sugar manufacture because bagasse arose as waste or by-product in the course of production and was not a final product merely by reference to the tariff. Rule 57D(1) protected credit where inputs were contained in waste, refuse, or by-product arising during manufacture, and that special protection made the Rule 57CC reversal mechanism inapplicable. The Revenue&#039;s contention therefore failed, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>