https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794483 Where the governing service rule required speed post with proof of delivery, mere dispatch without proof of delivery did not amount to valid service, and deemed service could not be inferred. Limitation for filing the appeal therefore could not run from the dispatch date, because it begins only from valid communication of the order. The rejection of the appeal as time-barred was set aside, and the matter was remitted for decision on merits after hearing the appellant. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794483 Where the governing service rule required speed post with proof of delivery, mere dispatch without proof of delivery did not amount to valid service, and deemed service could not be inferred. Limitation for filing the appeal therefore could not run from the dispatch date, because it begins only from valid communication of the order. The rejection of the appeal as time-barred was set aside, and the matter was remitted for decision on merits after hearing the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794483